Implications on Education, Technology and Place
Downloads
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.51588/eaaeacp.40Keywords:
architecture, education, technology, teaching, fetishAbstract
This paper identifies two visions of the challenge of technology integration in architecture for education. Then, the appropriateness of conceiving architecture from a holistic perspective of the human dwelling is suggested, proposing an awareness of its technological aspects. Finally, some considerations of technology in architecture, in particular in teaching and learning are challenged, first analytically and then with an integrative intention.
How to Cite
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2019 Fidel A. Meraz
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
References
Beistegui, M. de. The new Heidegger. Londres: Continuum, 2005.
Guy, S. y G. Farmer, ‘Reinterpreting sustainable architecture: The place of technology’. Journal of Architectural Education, 54(3) (2001): 140–148.
Kostof, S. y D. Cuff. The Architect. California: University of California Press, 2000.
Moore, S.A. ‘Technology, place, and the nonmodern thesis’. Journal of Architectural Education, 54(3) (2001): 130–139.
Otero-Pailos, J. ‘Living or Leaving the techno-apocalypse: Paul Virilio’s critique of technology and its contribution to architecture’. Journal of Architectural Education, 54(2) (2000): 104–110.
Smith Capon, D. Architectural Theory. Nueva York: John Wiley, 1999.
Trebilcock, M.E. The integration of environmental sustainability issues in the design process of contemporary architectural practice. PhD thesis, The University of Nottingham, 2007.
World Commission on Environment and Development. Published as Annex to General Assembly document A/42/427, 1987. Our Common Future: Informe de la World Commission on Environment and Development.