eaae_kylos
A Design-Build Experience

Kilyos Boathouse

Authors

Downloads

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.51588/eaaeacp.60

Keywords:

design-build studio, design education, hidden curriculum, learning by doing, horizontal learning

Abstract

As a part of the stated curriculum of MEF University Faculty of Arts, Design and Architecture, Design and Build! Studio (DBS) is a compulsory summer programme for students completing their first year in architecture and interior design. Within the framework of Design and Build! Studio, the school communicates its set of values through emphasizing learning by doing, horizontal learning and underlining the process. This paper discusses how a design-build studio can be a distinctive hidden quality of an architecture faculty through the case of Kilyos Boathouse project conducted in Summer 2018.

How to Cite

Aydemir, A. Z. (2020). A Design-Build Experience: Kilyos Boathouse. EAAE Annual Conference Proceedings, 154–175. https://doi.org/10.51588/eaaeacp.60

Published

2020-12-29

Issue

2020: The Hidden School Papers. EAAE Annual Conference Zagreb 2019 - Proceedings

Section

The Process

License

Copyright (c) 2020 Ayse Zeynep Aydemir

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Author Biography

Ayse Zeynep Aydemir, MEF University

Zeynep Aydemir received her BArch (2008) and MSc in Architectural Design (2011) degrees from Istanbul Technical University Faculty of Architecture. She completed her jointly supervised PhD entitled ‘Experiments, Practices and Positions in Architectural Design Studios’ at KU Leuven and ITU in 2017. Currently, she is a visiting postdoctoral research fellow at the Royal College of Art School of Architecture as a TUBITAK scholar. Her research interests include new pedagogies, design-build studios, bottom-up approaches, co-create and experimenting in architectural design studios.

References

Anderson, J., and Priest, C. (2012). Developing a live projects network and flexible methodology for live projects. In Live Projects Pedagogy International Symposium. Oxford Brookes University, UK.

Canizaro, V. B. (2012). Design-build in architectural education: Motivations, practices, challenges, successes and failures. International Journal of Architectural Research: ArchNet-IJAR, 6(3), 20–36.

Dewey, J. (1938). Experience and education. New York: Macmillan.

Dodd, M. (2015). Double Agency: The Art School, Critical Practice and Architecture. In H. Harriss & D. Froud (Eds.) Radical Pedagogies: Architectural Education and the British Tradition. London: RIBA Publishing, 21–31.

Dutton, T. A. (1987). Design and studio pedagogy. Journal of Architectural Education, 41(1), 16–25.

Harriss, H. (2015). Architecture Live Projects: acquiring and applying missing practice-ready skills (Doctoral dissertation, Oxford Brookes University).

Hinson, D. (2007). Design as research: Learning from doing in the design-build studio. Journal of Architectural Education, 61(1), 23–26.

Morrow, R. (2014). Live Project love: building a framework for Live Projects. Architecture Live Projects: Pedagogy into Practice.

Sara, R. (2004). Between the Studio and the Street: The Role of the Live Project in Architectural Education (Doctoral dissertation, University of Sheffield).