Downloads
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.51588/eaaeacp.61Keywords:
rethinking the crit, feedback, student ledAbstract
Assessment in architecture and creative arts schools has traditionally adopted a ‘one size fits all’ approach by using the ‘crit’, where students pin up their work, make a presentation and receive verbal feedback in front of peers and academic staff. In addition to increasing stress and inhibiting learning, which may impact more depending on gender and ethnicity, the adversarial structure of the ‘crit’ reinforces power imbalances and thereby ultimately contributes to the reproduction of dominant cultural paradigms. Our collaboration on an alternative to the traditional model was supported by the Teaching & Learning National Seminar Series fund which helped us organise an international symposium to debate the ‘crit’ in 2016. We have recently been awarded further funding which has allowed us to pilot alternative feedback methods.
How to Cite
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2020 Patrick Flynn, Miriam Dunn, Mark Price, Maureen O'Connor
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
References
Anthony, K. (1991). Design Juries on trial. London: Van Nostrand Reinhold.
Banham, R. (1996). A Black Box: The Secret Profession of Architecture, in: Banham, M. et al, eds., A Critic Writes: Selected Essays by Reyner Banham, University of California Press.
Bourdieu, P. (1990). Reproduction in Education, Culture and Society. London: Sage Publishing.
Dutton, T. (1991). Voices in Architectural Education, Cultural Politics and Pedagogy. New York: Bergin & Garvey.
Ralske, K. (May 2011). ‘The Crit,’ retnull.com/index.php?/texts/the-crit/ (accessed .08.13.19)
Various students, (May 2018), interviewed by Patrick Flynn, Dublin School of Architecture.
Various staff, (May 2018), interviewed by Patrick Flynn, Dublin School of Architecture.
Webster, H. (2005). “A Study of Ritual, Acculturation and Reproduction In Architectural Education,” Arts and Humanities in Higher Education, 4: 3.